"So if you truly want to name your tank, you put in the time to do all the effort in maintaining it. "I understand the guidance in the sense that we should really be getting after maintenance and really dedicated to your platform," they said. One former tanker currently serving in the Army who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media said that the idea is likely to encourage better maintenance. are both infantrymen, not tankers or cavalry scouts who are typically tied to the tradition of naming their tanks. III Corps comprises the bulk of the Army's heavy armor formations with the M1A2 Abrams tank serving as the marquee fighting platform for divisions, including the 1st Cavalry and 1st Armored Divisions. "But to deny them the ability to name their tanks while almost ensuring that will, due to the experience of their gunner, creates a dichotomous culture that doesn't breed competition, but animosity," they added. That leaves other, typically junior troops, working with less experienced gunners who are less likely to score highly during gunnery, although the officer said that they still have a responsibility to do well. "My immediate reaction is that this will alienate junior crews while ensuring that officers get to name their tanks," they said, adding that leaders in officer positions like platoon leader through battalion commander are often given the best gunners. "Accordingly, we must demand excellence of ourselves in order to meet that obligation, particularly in our competitive and unpredictable world."īut a currently serving field-grade armor officer, who was granted anonymity because they are not authorized to speak to the press, told that the policy could further divide the ranks. "The III Armored Corps has obligation to our nation to be prepared to fight and win anywhere in the world at any time," Donovan said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |